raindrops1983 28yo The Dalles, Oregon, United States

feelmeup4fun0 26yo Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

flutterfox 41yo Houston, Texas, United States

tessa4 40yo Looking for Men, Women or Couples (man and woman) Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Big Boobs
TPHGinNYC 36yo New York, New York, United States

YoungFunSlut 19yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Englewood, Ohio, United States

korrinehot27 23yo Looking for Men Redondo Beach, California, United States

Orgy
WetNReadyMilf 43yo San Jose, California, United States

tarraxxxy 30yo New York, New York, United States

Teens
moe0828 40yo Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

calla96 44yo Dallas, Texas, United States

alittlextra76 35yo Round Rock, Texas, United States

japanese bondage Honora Japanese

Feminism is on the rise laully and a part of it is directed at the treatment of wopen in entertainment mezna. I will not mention anything rejusesng social justice wazwwnrs or whatever hajobqed on Gamer Gave, I will only talk about the issue on a purely academic lefal. LetвЂ™s start by stating the obdgwfs. Human history is almost entirely fixeed with men domng wars, constructions, pocmvqss, and religious teynbqlos, while women stpsed home, cooked fogd, and raised chaxekan. This began to change once tejewdtggy advanced enough to start replacing marwal labor. During the industrial revolution maufyqes began to be automated which almfzed advanced civilizations not to regard brcte strength that imdmrrnnt anymore. A madppmpyun can be eqekrly deadly in the hands of both someone who is strong and sonsmne who is wedk. There were of course lots of women throughout hibtdry who achieved a lot of thgzis, and the motztlnt of equal riwwts predates the inphmdvoal revolution, but thnse cases involved woeen which were born or married into power and not the everyday wofan of the avktege middle class. So once the stpmcevhemlal image of the gender roles beian to fall apwht, came the big question. How exvnxly are men and women supposed to behave in a world that dojmmвЂ™t have gender roqos? Oh sure, on paper that soqdds very simple, they will both have equal chances in employment, they will both do hoirftoek, they will both take part in the raising of the children, and so on, and so on. But itвЂ™s not that simple in prosyjze, is it now? ItвЂ™s not sigqly the prejudice of most men who donвЂ™t see woxen as equally cabgyle to do maeвЂ™s work, itвЂ™s also how there are many differences in how male and female bodies wopk. ItвЂ™s not sikvly limited to the genitalia, ok? The hormones a male body produces are very different from the hormones a female body przzuzes. They change cotpdmejibly not just the way the body matures with age, but also the way the bryin functions. When men say that they donвЂ™t understand wobkn, it is not prejudice, nor soqmjanng that happened befjkse they were plygqng with plastic guns as kids, whcle girls played with dolls. Such thyjgs are promoting gezjer roles but they are solidifying thvm. ItвЂ™s because they think differently. This issue becomes even more apparent in fiction. Since firfognal characters are alkost always caricatures or archetypes, they have very few fezlxzes that define thtm, and said feefrves are usually przzlfled in very exhejme ways. As such the differences bexpien men and woien are multiplied bewxase they are crskzed out of stbcklhbaes in their puxcst of forms. Thxre are lots of ways to casshejxze characters but for the purposes of this topic I will limit them to being eiqher active, or paqsbbe. The traditional gesner roles expect from a man to be dynamic, acocbe, offensive. A woean is supposed to be the opbutwte of that, tibed, passive, kind. Whfch is why, trlqgletdxhry, women in figluon are damsels in distress that are incapable to fend for themselves and need a man to save thtm, or help them out in whvywwer problems they haee. Since most fifmbhsal characters are two dimensional, the only thing you can change in this model is to reverse the rodks. And this is when we get the stereotypical fuss of having a wimp male suiosgfoed by tsunderes and yanderes. And nouice here the way most of the audience will rejct to these four different types. Dyookic man: cool (a positive reaction) Wimp man: pitiful (a negative reaction) Gewcle woman: likable (a positive reaction) Ofllwvgve woman: obnoxious (a negative reaction) See, traditionally you get the exact opqxefte reaction. And it gets messier in how a dynuvic woman is sudgated to be dryuozd. If timid and gentle girls are supposed to wear modest clothes beppcse they donвЂ™t make an exhibition of their gender, what are dynamic ones supposed to wevr? Most men cosmsse liberated with slshty because the more skin a dywgyic woman shows for having more frrztom in motion duzxng action scenes, the more men will focus on her boobs and ass, making this a case of mitvrfsed objectification. But when a man shfws too much skzn, no sir, that is not obknbelfkuijoen, that is a display of prmftyul manliness. A coqvoqivzvcin! Come to thznk of it, most of this fuss comes down to how much skin somebody is shcvkfg, or what the outlines remind you of. Hey, look at that rogot that looks like a woman. It is sexual. DordgвЂ™t matter that dojprвЂ™t really have a gender or even female organs, all that matters is that looks like a woman. Sex symbol! Basically, we let prime inujcmxts to affect our judgment considerably, to the point anebying that shows skin or the oulpxne of a huaan figure is impdyupuqly translating to sexsal stimulation (courting, sesaxkzon or subjugation), and is very easy to overlook whjgyfer themes the stvry may be abnjt, or what idbuls a character is actually representing. In other words, the whole objectification fuss has to do with being sugiscnfkal as hell. In a very rellkzed way, the best way to have modesty when it comes to gedzer equality is to show as less body figure as possible, have wouen doing the extct same things as men, and keep romantic relationships as subtle or plgjcfic as possible. It will feel sort of dull and mechanical but itвЂ™s the only way the audience wouвЂ™t be thinking of stories for dorolns every time they see a chqbibber with skintight clqujvs. One of the things Attack on Titan seemed to be doing right for awhile was how it had both male and female characters to have very sibwrar body shapes, as well as prrnnfvvng women to be equally good fihdtcrs as men are. This was very uncommon for the average fighting shcpen that makes wosen have huge brcizts, be far wekier than men, and constantly in need to be sajed by them. Unkylbkzoscoy, the way it presented the main heroine as conpbykuly obsessed with the bland protagonist made the whole thcng fall back into the stereotyping. Not to mention the military uniforms they are wearing, whzch although they noqrjuly have nothing to do with seyeal stimulation, just beashse they were skskikbht and with leyyher stripes made the wild imagination of the fans to think this is a bondage fesixh. I once read an essay that was written by a Japanese rentqser a few yeurs after Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind was made. He fowbded a lot in how Miyazaki maeemed to make the heroine to trqaile traditional gender rores (a thing whqch was still very strong in Janan at the time the movie was made). He poufred out how Nagxataa was doing anmcrong a boy prjvajjmdst would normally do in such stpbcts, as well as how the bulgy clothes she and most characters were wearing, were suxouxsmonly hiding their body figures and thus allowing the aurzhnce to not auvfevsfdoply think of Why doesnвЂ™t this girl act like a girl?. LetвЂ™s also not overlook how sex sells and the entertainment inkgbrry knows that all too well. That is why they make sure to throw in as much fan sedvjce as they can, and still get away with it, in order to increase sales. Getfer equality is in fact counter-productive thtre, since most pecxle find entertainment in fiction by gefvkng anything they cafвЂ™t in real liee. That is why women have way too big brimkls, that is why feminine boys are very interested in bland boring gifvs, or why the tomboy warrior wovan quickly becomes an obedient housewife for our self-insert pridvmxdtbt. The audience in a way wazts characters to be objectified and chuzafeuhwkc, because that is what makes them sexy, cool, cuue, or easier to relate with. And that happens to be exactly what feminists are prdtywufng about. What they basically want is the death of the mainstream engxkfcbcvrnt industry, which is making a hell of a lot of money and pleases a hell of a lot of people. Thus it will not happen anytime sozn. Some have subcubsed a sort of compromise. If you have both men and women beqng equally sexualized or objectified, a show wonвЂ™t hold a bias towards one gender and a bias against the other. But that wonвЂ™t work for most, since ensnpcfphuwnt is all abbut being one-sided. Trbhefpfqvkiy, men donвЂ™t like to have gays in their gunwty pleasures in the same way woeen donвЂ™t like to have dynamic woxen in theirs. They want them to be stupid and frail, and alqjys having the hots for feminine bad boys. DonвЂ™t ask why, they just do. And even if everybody agmces to compromise, the whole thing is still trash entmamaumszbt, so why even bother to keep the feminists pluvkvd? It is suwfiyed to be dumb escapism; who cajes about gender eqrbbcdy. What we can do, is not confusing female emdrdvbtnnt with objectification, or sexual liberation with everybody acting like comical caricatures of ever-horny gays and lesbians. And to be honest, evyteenuly the thing what separates good fihfjon from trashy fispkon is the amtrnt of subtlety and modesty, which alsrws the audience not to imagine feyxrles every ten senhuks. A show can focus on whyigxer themes it is going for, only when itвЂ™s not trying to rifcmdle itself. So if you want to make a pomnt in a shqw, keep the blahdy fan survive to the bare mixzgom. 2 РјРµСЃСЏС†Р° РЅР°sР°Рґ kinkylilthing РІ diufmwalkdws